
About MUTAVI Research and Advisory Group
Dirk Van den Abeele
MUTAVI was founded by John Van Eerd and Inte Onsman in 1985. When the MUTAVI group was set up, the intention was to ensure a more scientific approach to the writing of articles about genetics, feather structure, pigmentation, mutations, etc. After the sudden death of John Van Eerd the complete coordination was taken over by Inte Onsman.
Within MUTAVI, a lot of research has been conducted into pigment abnormalities related to mutant phenotypes of which the origin or inheritance is not yet completely clear. To be able to analyse this, cross-sections of 1/4000 mm were made of different feathers. These cross-sections were coloured with the help of chemicals and, after drying, could be studied and photographed under the microscope. After comparing it with the pigmentation of the wild type we are able to determine what exactly happens to the eumelanin and what types of mutations we are dealing with. To support these results and conclusions, MUTAVI has a database of more than 2000 articles of which 90% are from scientific literature, and which form the basis for analysing and writing about the things which keep us occupied in this hobby. There is also an extensive library and the bulk of scientific literature is constantly searched for articles which deal with the things we need to know; this allows us to write more well-grounded articles from which we can all learn and profit. We also cooperate with different scientists in order to obtain necessary scientific advice and literature.
MUTAVI is a completely independent platform, not bound to any organisations. Only if project groups ask to collaborate with MUTAVI, research is conducted, advice offered and seminars held to improve research into the different bird species. The guidelines of MUTAVI are always advisory.
Since MUTAVI had already done research since 1985 we knew that although there were a lot of names, genetically speaking there were only a limited number of known mutations among the parakeets. If we wanted a stable system then it was necessary to base our criteria on what comparison was possible within the various mutations. These were the genotype (genetics - which locus is affected - how does it inherit?) and the formation of the pigments and the mutations' feather structure (what exactly happens in the feather).
This way a system was constructed step by step within MUTAVI which had a certain logical and scientific foundation. In the first instance it was attempted to apply this system in Belgium and the Netherlands. But with the advent of the Internet in the 1990s emails were sent around the world by a single mouse click and it became easier for the average amateur to establish international contacts. This only made it clear once more that there was a lot of confusion and subsequently people started seeing the need for clear conventions regarding the mutation names. One person who saw this and definitely contributed is Terry Martin. In 1999 he started the Genetics-Psittacine list on the Internet. This entailed a discussion of the existing parakeet mutations joined by breeders and specialists from various countries. Because there was also a lot of confusion on this email list the participants of the discussion searched for a solution to establish a naming system. The goals were clear: the use of one and the same (fitting) name for one and the same mutation, applicable to all species. Of course MUTAVI contributed and thanks to our feather research, combined with the breeding experiences of the people on the list, a lot of 'unknown' mutations revealed their secrets and their true identity could be discovered. Terry Martin comprised these data into his book and published 'A guide to Colour Mutations & Genetics in Parrots' in 2002. This book was the first to promote a uniform naming convention for parakeet mutations. This was a first major step towards an international nomenclature. Yet this was only the beginning. Within MUTAVI we received more and more requests for cooperation and not only from the parakeet world, even people from the canary and exotic world wanted to cooperate. As a result more mutations, even from these different families, were examined in more detail and thanks to these research results earlier assumptions or names could be adjusted. For everything is open to improvement and the larger the supporting area the more stable the system becomes.